A new investigation by Jeremy McGowan

THEDISCLOSURE
TRAP

When America asks for answers, who else is listening?

  • MSSChina

    Ministry of State Security
  • FSBRussia

    Federal Security Service
  • GRURussia

    Main Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation
  • SVRRussia

    Foreign Intelligence Service
  • MOISIran

    Ministry of Intelligence and Security
  • RGBNorth Korea

    Reconnaissance General Bureau
Original editorial symbols.

An examination of how the American UFO disclosure crusade is useful to foreign adversaries, and what demands for unrestricted disclosure puts at risk.

Submitted to the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review (DOPSR). Publication date to be announced.

Cover of The Disclosure Trap by Jeremy McGowan, a symbolic editorial montage with puppet strings, dark clouds, and red and gold lettering.Back cover of The Disclosure Trap by Jeremy McGowan, with the headline America wants answers. Someone else sees an opening., a book summary on white, and ISBN 9798162704812 barcode at the lower left.

Select either cover to open a larger view.

How America's UFO Disclosure Crusade Aids Enemies of the State

American voices. Foreign advantage.

Read the editorial notice

The question behind the book

EXTRAORDINARY CLAIMS HAVE EXTRAORDINARY CONSEQUENCES

A witness sees something they can't explain in the sky. An extraordinary explanation takes hold. A demand for answers becomes a political cause. Once that story enters public circulation, unintended consequences can change the strength of the national security of the United States.

01

Political reuse

Claims of reverse engineered alien technology and UFOs are exploited by foreign intelligence agencies.

The book examines foreign political reuse of American disclosure advocacy. Its argument does not require the Americans involved to have been recruited, directed, or knowingly cooperating.

02

Release risk

An extraordinary interpretation can surround ordinary secrets.

The book separately examines the risk that disclosure demands could expose useful conventional military or intelligence information if safeguards fail. That risk is not proof that a particular compromise occurred.

Truth deserves evidence. Released information requires judgement.

THE ANATOMY OF SENSATIONALISM AND ITS USE BY ENEMIES OF THE STATE

Follow the claim.

How a mistaken observation can have unintended consequences.

Choose a stage of the illustrative claim sequence. Use arrow keys to change stages.
A dark object inside the tracking display in the Navy FLIR recording.

Navy FLIR recording, 2004. An observation captured by a sensor.

U.S. Navy / NAVAIR. Video frame, approximately 00:40.

The appearance of U.S. Department of War (DoW) visual information does not imply or constitute DoW endorsement.

View image source and context

Stage 01 / Observation

Something was observed.

A person reports an unfamiliar object or event. The observation and the explanation are separate questions.

“Whereof nowise the causes do men know, And think divinities are working there.”

— LucretiusOf the Nature of ThingsBook VI, introductory passage. Translated by William Ellery Leonard.

What was actually recorded?

Annotated GoFast sensor values beside diagrams of viewing geometry and apparent motion in NASA’s 2023 report.

GoFast analysis in NASA’s 2023 report: sensor data and geometry inform interpretation.

NASA report, printed page 28. Figure excerpt; Navy sensor imagery.

The appearance of U.S. Department of War (DoW) visual information does not imply or constitute DoW endorsement.

View image source and context

Stage 02 / Interpretation

An explanation takes shape.

An unknown can become an extraordinary claim before the available measurements distinguish it from other explanations.

“Well, if you don’t know what it is, that’s where your conversation should stop!”

— Neil deGrasse Tyson

What else could explain it?

Ryan Graves, David Grusch and David Fravor seated at the witness table during the July 26, 2023 House UAP hearing.

David Grusch (center), with Ryan Graves and David Fravor, at a House UAP hearing, July 26, 2023.

U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability / official hearing broadcast, via Wikimedia Commons. U.S. public domain. Resized; full frame preserved.

View image source and context

Image rights: U.S. public domain

Stage 03 / Credential

Authority enters the story.

Experience can make a witness worth hearing. A credential does not, by itself, verify the claim being made.

“For what a man had rather were true he more readily believes.”

— Francis BaconNovum Organum, Book I, Aphorism XLIX

What does the credential establish?

Rows of television cameras and journalists covering a United Nations press conference.

Press coverage after a U.N. Security Council meeting on Syria, December 18, 2015.

U.S. Department of State. Independent media-context example.

View image source and context

Stage 04 / Headline

The story travels.

A shorter retelling carries greater certainty than the original evidence supports. Repetition widens the gap.

“False memories are constructed by combining actual memories with the content of suggestions received from others.”

— Elizabeth F. LoftusCreating False MemoriesScientific American, September 1997.

What context has been lost?

An authentic draft amendment excerpt headed Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure, with the short title UAP Disclosure Act of 2023.

Proposed UAP Disclosure Act amendment, July 2023. Draft excerpt.

U.S. Senate draft. This image does not identify the proposal as enacted law.

View image source and context

Stage 05 / Disclosure demand

Attention becomes political pressure.

A call for investigation can become a demand to publish supporting records. Authorized oversight and unrestricted publication have different consequences.

“ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge”

— Charles DarwinThe Descent of Man, Introduction

Who should examine the records?

AI-assisted illustration: a fictional uniformed foreign operative studies invented declassified fighter-aircraft documents at a desk.

A fictional foreign-intelligence analysis scene with invented fighter-aircraft documents.

Original AI-assisted editorial artwork. Fictional person, uniform, documents and setting.

Stage 06 / Unintended audience

Someone else is listening.

Foreign actors can reuse a public argument without directing its author. If a release exposes protected information, its value can extend far beyond the original debate.

“Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts.”

— Arthur Conan DoyleA Scandal in BohemiaSpoken by Sherlock Holmes.

Who else could use the answer?

The author behind the investigation

On screen. In print. A different question.

Jeremy McGowan

Jeremy McGowan in a white suit and dark tie against a gray background.
Jeremy McGowan

Jeremy McGowan is an author, U.S. Air Force combat veteran, and UFO researcher with a professional background in defense contracting.

He spent 12 years in uniform, including more than two years in the Middle East during Operation Desert Storm and other regional operations. In the mid-1990s, he was attached to Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for counternarcotics missions in the jungles of Colombia.

His civilian background includes defense contracting, program management, and technical writing. That experience informs his focus on evidence, the handling of sensitive information, and the distinction between public accountability and unrestricted disclosure.

His public investigation began with a personal sighting and developed into efforts to collect measurable data through the O.S.I.R.I.S. Project. His four-part Medium account, published in 2022, traces that journey and his growing scrutiny of credibility, claims, and the incentives surrounding them.

His publications also include a 2025 research paper posted on SSRN, examining UFO narratives, networks of influence, and the national security risks he argues can accompany disclosure campaigns.

McGowan's screen work spans documentary films and television. Selected appearances as himself include A Tear in the Sky, Dark Alliance: The Next Generation, and Mission Unexplained. His IMDb profile lists additional credits from his broader screen work. These appearances form part of his continuing engagement with the public UFO conversation.

In The Disclosure Trap, he turns that experience toward a broader question: how claims gain authority, how their purpose can change, and what demands for public release can put at risk.

View all IMDb-listed screen and production credits

Research paper / SSRN preprint / 2025

How Thiel, Musk & Omidyar Turned UFO Hype into a Security Risk

McGowan's analysis of UFO disclosure narratives, influential networks, and the national security risks he argues they can create.

View paper on SSRN

Selected screen appearances

Public appearances across a changing conversation.

Jeremy's Land Rover at night, with antennas and roof equipment illuminated in blue-green light and red light across the ground.Documentary film / 2022

Jeremy's Land Rover at night. Author archive photograph.

A Tear in the Sky

Appearing as himself

An appearance in a film about a public effort to investigate unidentified aerial phenomena.

View film : A Tear in the Sky

Film information. Viewing options may require payment.

Three armed silhouettes in a wooded setting, backlit in blue, in the series publicity image.Documentary series / 2023

Mission Unexplained publicity scene. Blue Ant Media.

Mission Unexplained

Appearing as himself

His account is featured in a series built around unexplained experiences reported by military personnel.

View program : Mission Unexplained

Program information. Availability varies by region and provider.

Red-orange portal graphic and three silhouettes beneath the trailer's speculative question about military stargates.Documentary film

Dark Alliance trailer graphic. Promotional imagery and speculation.

Dark Alliance: The Next Generation

Appearing as himself

A documentary appearance within the wider public discussion of UFO claims and investigation.

View film : Dark Alliance: The Next Generation

Film information. Viewing availability and cost vary.

The public account

Before the book, a search for answers.

The following essays, published in 2022, recount Jeremy's initial experience and introduction to the world of UFOs. The essays follow his journey through a web of attempted indoctrination, lies, and opportunism by some of today's most prolific UFO celebrities and provide insight on how he became the skeptic of people's claims that he is now.

Original AI-assisted editorial illustrations inspired by the essays; not documentary photographs.

Publication status

The investigation continues.
Publication is pending.

About prepublication review

DOPSR—the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review—reviews written material before public release to identify classified and other protected government information.

Jeremy’s military service and defense-contracting background carry continuing responsibilities to protect information learned through that work. Because this book addresses military and national-security matters, he submitted the manuscript for prepublication security review before publication.

DOPSR coordinates with the government offices responsible for the information in a manuscript. Reviewers check for protected details and issue a written release decision, which may require changes or deletions before publication.

Submitted to the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review (DOPSR). Publication date to be announced.

DOPSR review information

The manuscript has been submitted to the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review (DOPSR). Clearance has not been established.

Pre-Order the book on Amazon

Publication updates

Stay with the investigation.

Request news when a publication date is established and The Disclosure Trap becomes available.

For Jeremy's public posts in the meantime:

Follow @desertdiaries on X

Contact the author

Contact the author - especially if you are a fan, an agent, or a publisher with a large check. Submit your message in the form - 1000 characters max. Do not send threats, harassment, or personal attacks against the author or fellow readers. Accepted messages are recorded with the connection IP address, a submission ID and the server time. Relevant evidence may be reviewed for a report to appropriate authorities. Any referral is a separate human decision; messages are not automatically forwarded.

Messages are screened automatically before manual review. No automatic email reply is sent.

Do not include passwords, government identification documents, classified information, or unnecessary sensitive information.

Contact details

Maximum 1,000 characters, including spaces and line breaks.

0 / 1000 characters

The separate Cloudflare contact service stores accepted messages privately with the connection IP address, a submission ID and UTC server time. Messages blocked by the content filter are not saved as contact submissions. IP addresses are scheduled for removal after 30 days by an hourly purge, unless a documented case hold with a recorded end date applies. D1 recovery can retain earlier data for seven days after changes to active records. Relevant evidence may be exported for a potential manual referral; no message is automatically forwarded. Your ZIP or postal code is self-reported and is not matched to an IP location. Contact does not subscribe you to publication news. Privacy notice

Editorial notice

The Disclosure Trap was authored in the State of Nevada, United States. This independently authored work presents analysis, criticism, and commentary concerning public claims about unidentified flying objects and unidentified anomalous phenomena, disclosure advocacy, and potential consequences for U.S. national security. Names and likenesses identify individuals whose public statements, activities, or influence the book examines. Their inclusion serves an editorial purpose and does not represent their authorship, participation in the book’s production, authorization, sponsorship, approval, or endorsement.

The book’s central distinction is between the potential consequences of public advocacy and the intentions of the people engaged in it. Its thesis concerns whether foreign governments or intelligence services could exploit aspects of disclosure discourse to advance interests adverse to U.S. national security, including without the knowledge, intent, cooperation, or consent of the individuals whose statements or activities the book discusses. An assessment that a statement, narrative, or policy could benefit a foreign adversary is not an accusation that the person advancing it serves that adversary, shares its objectives, or intends such a benefit. The possibility of exploitation does not, by itself, establish that exploitation occurred.

The cover is a constructed editorial illustration, not documentary evidence or a representation of an actual gathering or event. Its puppet strings, controlling figure, altered clothing, military-style insignia, and national imagery function as visual metaphors for the author’s concerns about potential exploitation and unintended consequences. These elements do not assert that any depicted individual wore the illustrated clothing, held a foreign military rank, accepted foreign orders, or maintained a recruitment, financing, tasking, direction, or control relationship with a foreign government or intelligence service. The grouping of individuals does not assert a common plan, coordinated conduct, or shared intent.

In the subtitle, “Enemies Of The State” refers to foreign adversaries of the United States, not to the Americans portrayed on the cover or to people who advocate disclosure. The word “aids” concerns the author’s assessment of potential consequences or advantages, not an accusation of intentional assistance. Neither the cover nor the central thesis it illustrates accuses the depicted individuals of espionage, treason, covert foreign allegiance, or knowing participation in a foreign intelligence operation. The cover’s symbolism does not identify any depicted individual as a foreign agent or establish an operational relationship between that individual and a foreign power.

The author offers interpretations, inferences, and assessments of risk for evaluation against the factual material and sources identified in the text. Those judgments do not purport to reveal undisclosed evidence of secret foreign relationships or instructions. Hypothetical scenarios and fictional illustrations, where expressly identified as such, describe possibilities rather than reported events. Similarities between public narratives and foreign interests do not, without additional supporting evidence, establish coordination, operational involvement, or control. Readers should distinguish factual statements, attributed claims, analytical judgments, and hypothetical examples according to their content and context.

The views and assessments expressed are the author’s own. They do not purport to represent an official finding, intelligence assessment, or position of the United States Government, any government agency, or any present or former employer. References to institutions, professional affiliations, military service, or public positions provide context and do not imply institutional approval of the book or its conclusions.

To the extent Nevada law applies, the author invokes the exceptions to the written-consent requirement established by Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 597.790(2)(c), (d), and (f). Subsection (2)(c) addresses qualifying uses associated with news and public-affairs publications. Subsection (2)(d) addresses portrayals and simulations of individuals in books and other identified expressive works, except when the use directly connects to commercial sponsorship. Subsection (2)(f) addresses advertisements and commercial announcements for uses permitted by that subsection. The likenesses in this work identify subjects of substantive commentary rather than purported sponsors or endorsers. The author relies on these exceptions subject to their statutory conditions, not as an unrestricted authorization to exploit an individual’s identity. Nevada Legislature

The author also invokes the freedoms of speech and press protected by article 1, section 9, of the Nevada Constitution and by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. These authorities provide the constitutional foundation for the author’s exercise of protected expression concerning matters of public interest. See Nev. Const. art. 1, § 9; U.S. Const. amend. I; amend. XIV, § 1. Nevada Legislature

Federal judicial decisions recognize that the First Amendment can protect expressive portrayals of real individuals against state-law publicity claims. In Sarver v. Chartier, 813 F.3d 891, 905–906 (9th Cir. 2016), the court held that applying California’s right-of-publicity law to the expressive film at issue would violate the First Amendment. The author invokes that constitutional protection to the extent applicable to this book’s editorial treatment of its subjects.

The author further invokes constitutional protection for criticism, opinion without a provably false factual implication, and rhetorical hyperbole that reasonable readers would not understand as an assertion of actual facts. These protections depend on the substance and context of the expression, not merely its designation as opinion, commentary, or illustration. See Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 18–21 (1990).

The author claims no ownership in any person’s identity or in independently owned third-party material.

“Enemies of the State” in the subtitle refers to foreign adversaries of the United States. The book examines potential consequences and advantages, including reuse without the knowledge, intent, cooperation, or consent of the Americans discussed. It does not accuse depicted individuals of espionage, treason, or knowing service to a foreign power.

The book's analytical judgments are distinct from reported facts and attributed claims. The Light Over the Range is explicitly fiction and is not factual evidence. Security-review permission, if granted, would not establish Government endorsement or factual validation.

The views are the author's. No Government agency, broadcaster, platform, or person referenced here is represented as sponsoring or endorsing the book.

Privacy details

Squarespace stores your email address and your permission to receive book-publication news so your request can be fulfilled. Use the contact form linked below to withdraw your request. The privacy notice explains notification requests and the separate contact service.

Read the full privacy notice · California & EU privacy rights · Cookies & tracking